prillalar: (tenma fighting)
prillalar ([personal profile] prillalar) wrote2005-04-29 10:11 pm

Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy movie

In a word: meh.

In three words: what the fuck?

In a few paragraphs:

While I went in with low expectations, I was still hopeful for a fun time. But the movie missed the whole point in a big, big way. You know, just the same as any time there's a US remake of an excellent UK television series. All the sharpness is gone, they use a mallet instead of a needle.

And the ending? Happy, happy, the earth is back but Arthur won't stay because now he loves adventure? Sure, right. This Arthur is never going to be the Sandwich Maker because he's too busy being bloody James T Kirk David Livingston.

I weep.

That said, I did enjoy Martin Freeman's performance. Sam Rockwell is always fun. Mos Def was, hmm, poorly directed? I didn't really like Zooey Deschanel that much. Stephen Fry was, as always, wonderful and I thought the way they animated the Guide was excellent.

Humma Kavula was really cool, but it seemed like that thread was completely dropped.

Some of the design I liked a lot -- Magrathea especially. The dolphin song was très fun.

And Ford couldn't keep his hands off Arthur.

In the end, though, it was wrong, and worse than that, it was dull. Douglas deserved so much better.

There was a credit cookie, so if you're there, be sure to stay for it.

[identity profile] arallara.livejournal.com 2005-04-29 10:21 pm (UTC)(link)
In the end, though, it was wrong, and worse than that, it was dull.

Yikes, that pretty much sums up exactly what I was afraid of. I probably won't be rushing to see it, though it seems like one of those movies that I might want to see on the big screen for the effects. Because without the added entertainment of big screen special effects it would be even more dull, I suppose.

*sigh*
ladysorka: (Default)

[personal profile] ladysorka 2005-04-29 10:25 pm (UTC)(link)
Yes. It was just... dull. I honestly checked my watch around five times, which is never a good sign. They just seemed to... miss the point. Really, really miss the point. And it seemed to drag in places as well.

Plus, it wasn't even all that funny.

I mean, there were good bits, but as a whole? Not so much.

[identity profile] biggersandwich.livejournal.com 2005-04-30 05:23 am (UTC)(link)
Yeah, I saw it too and I agree with you so much. I was expecting better as Douglas is actually credited with the screenplay but apparently they've made several additions since his death.

Though the dolphins were awesome.

[identity profile] biggersandwich.livejournal.com 2005-05-02 07:57 am (UTC)(link)
They probably did feel that they were sticking closely to his screenplay; the movie industry also thought that the movie "I, Robot" had anything to do with Asimov.

Humma Kuvala was okay...I think I was busy going WTF at that little extra plot bit to pay much attention to him.

[identity profile] gulliblesnail.livejournal.com 2005-04-30 11:09 am (UTC)(link)
I didn't think it was bad, but I left feeling sad that there wasn't more to make me fall rabidly in love with it. I did like Zaphod a lot. I remember reading (by Neil Gaiman, probably?) about how each version of Hitchhiker's Guide that works is a reinvention of it that also does new things with the medium it's created in, and I guess this just didn't quite do that for me. I already knew the big jokes from the books, so it was disappointing to have less to laugh at. I don't have any hatred for it, but maybe it was a little too safe and that's part of the problem.

[identity profile] biggersandwich.livejournal.com 2005-05-02 07:58 am (UTC)(link)
Well, DA himself said that "each new version of HHGttG contradicts all the previous ones" if that's what you're thinking of...

[identity profile] gulliblesnail.livejournal.com 2005-05-02 06:22 pm (UTC)(link)
Ah, you're right, they've both said something about that. I think what I was trying to remember specifically was Neil Gaiman talking about why the Hitchhiker's comic never did as well as the other versions of the story, but I'm not sure if it was in his blog or the "Don't Panic!" book.

[identity profile] biggersandwich.livejournal.com 2005-05-02 06:25 pm (UTC)(link)
He could have, I haven't read either so I don't know.

[identity profile] leaper182.livejournal.com 2005-04-30 02:02 pm (UTC)(link)
Squee. Methinks there's a possibility for Ford/Arthur if you completely throw out the Arthur/Trillian plotline.

Humma Kavula = Elton John. It was scary.

Hi, btw! Read the fic you co-wrote with [livejournal.com profile] laurashapiro, More Things in Heaven and Earth (http://prillalar.com/fic/stories/000104.php), and I've been meaning to fangirl you.

::flail flail::

::fangirls you::

[identity profile] leaper182.livejournal.com 2005-05-02 09:24 am (UTC)(link)
... I remember when red was yellow / Me and Suzy had so much fun...

It was EERIE how much John Malkovich looked like the Rocket Man.

::twitch::

... you're in the Stargate SG-1 fandom, aren't you?

[identity profile] chzbrgr-of-doom.livejournal.com 2005-04-30 02:27 pm (UTC)(link)
I thought it was pretty funny, but I have not read the book. I'm sure that the book must be better, as is usually the case, but the movie amused me for what it was. I got a kick out of some of it, and I watched it on little sleep so maybe that helped.

[identity profile] chzbrgr-of-doom.livejournal.com 2005-05-02 09:12 am (UTC)(link)
I didn't find it hard to follow, although I felt that there might have been something missing in the overall.

I was most amused by the part with the whale falling to its death, for some reason it's thoughts just cracked me up, and then the bowl of petunias. XD I also enjoyed the "I think I'm a sofa" bit, because it was so delightfully random. The narration was fun too, which is why I think the books would be fun. Also, the fact that the movie began with a bunch of dolphins singing also helped. XD

I think the random-ness is what really made me enjoy it.